You may have heard some old school comics fans, among them respected artists like Stephen Bissette and James Sturm, are boycotting “The Avengers”.
Why? Because of the treatment of Jack Kirby at the hands of Marvel.
As we’ve mentioned before, creator’s rights are a sticky issue, especially for the creators themselves. A lot of artists and writers are incredibly bitter about the treatment they’ve received at the hands of the comics industry, and not without reason. Even though today, creators get much more respect and better treatment, including the rights to their own creations, there are still problems throughout the industry and the “work-for-hire” question is still an important one. In fact, Marvel just turned around and absolutely crushed Gary Friedrich, the creator of Ghost Rider, for no explicable reason other than the fact that they could. The man literally cannot call himself the creator of Ghost Rider.
All that said, boycotting “The Avengers” isn’t going to get any justice for the Kirby estate, and it definitely isn’t going to do anything to Marvel. Here’s why.
#5) It’s Hypocritical to Focus on One Creator
So…anybody going to not go see “Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance” because of Friedrich getting kicked in the teeth (I know Sturm and Bissette aren’t, but what about the rest of the pro-Kirby crowd)? Anybody boycott Green Lantern because Bill Finger and Martin Nodell’s estates didn’t get so much as a nod in the opening credits? Anybody angry Bob Kane’s estate isn’t seeing much of anything from “Gotham City Impostors”? Anybody putting together a petition for Chris Claremont or John Byrne to get some credit on the X-Men movies?
No? Therein lies the problem: some creators are more privileged than others, even in the eyes of fans. Friedrich is currently trying to figure out how to pay a massive conglomerate $17,000 when his attempt to get some justice left him penniless, and almost nobody cares, because he’s not Jack Kirby, the King of Comics. And that’s garbage.
Every creator or no creator: it’s that simple.
#4) The Wider Audience Will Make This Film a Hit, and It Doesn’t Care
Look, the nerds will see it a dozen times, but realistically speaking, Disney isn’t making these movies because we’ll like them. We’re just the gatekeepers they have to please to release movies across the country. Unfortunately, audiences have short attention spans, and it’s been hard for the Kirby estate to get traction with the news media (for reasons we’ll get into).
#3) It’s Going to Hurt the Filmmakers, Not Disney
Let’s say the boycott gets traction, and “The Avengers” underperforms.
Guess what? Disney won’t care. We’re talking about a multi-billion conglomerate that has already made its money back on the Marvel purchases with cartoon series and collecting money for nothing from other studios that licensed their characters. Disney is going to make a mint off of other studios churning out hit movies of properties they now own.
No, the people who suffer will be the cast and crew: they’re the ones who couldn’t sell a big summer movie. And they’re not the ones who hurt Kirby.

Thank you for writing this. I was going to to try and reply to the original article but you have done a better job than I could have hoped to.
Interestingly enough, I’ve been boycotting Marvel comic books for several years now. Well, not boycotting, per se, more like avoiding, because I can’t possible follow the story arcs when they are spread out over 20+ different titles and one-shots.
Honestly, until it became part of my job to read comics (even if I don’t comment on them, I’m Creative Director around here, so I’ve got to at least have a rough idea of what they’re up to), I’ve been uneasy buying Marvel Comics. There’s an air of vindictiveness and hostility in how they treat creators and competitors that’s…unpleasant.
Disney will crush creator rights wherever possible. Can’t have Ub Iwerks’ relatives getting a leg up on Mickey Mouse.
The problem is Marvel was acting like this well before the Mouse came along. The fact that they’re still holding Kirby’s artwork is ridiculous. I know Kirby’s DC art is at least out there, although I’m not sure if DC returned his pages or not.
True. I just meant it’s like continually trying to get into a padlocked steel door for 40 years, then one day you show up for the next attempt and they’ve dug a moat around it and installed machine guns.
Marvel likes saying “Fuck You” to its talent in as public a manner as possible.
Just ask Edward Norton.
Yeah, Norton really should have been given free reign on “The Incredible Hulk”.
It sucks, but it’s kinda the nature of the beast. Would Kirby have gotten the publicity and distribution without Marvel when he first created these characters? History says no. Look at the amount of solid characters that have slipped into obscurity because they don’t have the corporate backing. At least Marvel isn’t suing him/his people for unrelated works like Fantasy Inc sued John Fogerty for being too much like himself…
I just read that comment and felt kinda gross… That’s the world we live in, where the good side is that the corporate entity isn’t destroying you needlessly just because they can. Ugh.
I agree that the system is tilted against the artist, absolutely. And we should be opposed to that. It’s just a question of targeting our dislike so the right people feel it.
First, why do you keep using the term “banning” when you mean “boycotting?”
And you’re wrong on this issue. It isn’t the FINANCIAL losses that will matter to Marvel/Disney; it’s the NEGATIVE PUBLICITY this will generate, that it is ALREADY generating. Yers, every comicbook reader in the USA could boycott Avengers and it wouldn’t amount to even 3 million dollars, and this film will probably see a domestic gross well over 300 million. But PUBLICIZE the fact that angry lifelong fans are boycotting and you’ve got the beginnings of a public perception nightmare. Neal Adams spearheaded a campaign of shame against Warner/DC in 1978 on behalf of Seigel and Shuster and IT WORKED. And that was without benefit of the internet and social networking and the many 24-hour news machines that eat this kind of stuff up. A boycott alone may not get these assholes to change their behavior, but as part of an overall campaign of shame, it will certainly do its part.
Marvel and DC have substantially different corporate cultures, to put it mildly. I agree that shaming might work, but I don’t think grousing about not seeing a movie coming out in four months will quite do the trick.
also, LOOK AT IT!!! S’FUCKIN AWESOME!