You probably had absolutely no idea that DC had announced a bunch of Watchmen prequels, but they did. Also, we’re sure you’re shocked that Alan Moore isn’t a fan of the idea. But doesn’t he use other people’s characters all the time? Doesn’t that make him a hypocrite?
Well, Image Comics head Eric Stephenson thinks you should shut up, because Alan Moore had a contract and DC was totally going to give the characters back but then they made too much money.
OK, OK, it’s more complex than that. And Stephenson is, understandably, decidedly for creator’s rights: it’s why he has his job right now, it’s what Image was founded on. So why is this a big deal to comics creators and absolutely nobody else in the fandom, who are more concerned with the books possibly sucking?
Because, really, this is about the worst place to discuss creator’s rights.
Here’s the thing: yes, Moore got screwed. He signed a contract that would have returned the rights to him had “Watchmen” ever gone out of print, because at the time, “graphic novels” were unheard of, and the idea of one staying perpetually in print was a joke. So really what we being to asked to mourn here is that Alan Moore was too good at his job. Which is undeniably crappy, but at the same time, evaluating that deal, it’s pretty fair, especially for 1986.
Moore is not really a symbol of the screwed creator, as much as people are trying to make this about creator’s rights. As more than a few comics professionals have pointed out, Moore is in a unique position that he doesn’t seem to appreciate. If Moore had really wanted his characters back, he could have taken them pretty much any time he wanted, and had total control over any Watchmen content DC produced to boot. He commands page rates that even guys like Grant Morrison can only dream of. As it stands, Paul Levitz, who ran DC for years, explicitly blocked any attempts to make “Watchmen” sequels or prequels specifically because he was hoping to repair relations with Moore at some point. Literally no other creator gets that kind of treatment.
Part of the problem creator’s rights face in this industry is that most fans frankly don’t care. It’s kind of horrible, but it’s the truth: we care a lot more about the characters than we generally do about the guys creating them, unless the creators are screwing up or have weird private lives. Bill Mantlo essentially had to be killed as a human being before fans started caring about how creators were treated.
And the Big Two know that if they screw over a creator, ultimately the fans aren’t going to stop buying comics. We all know “Before Watchmen” is going to sell millions of comics. It’s not in question. It’s a bit like heroin addicts complaining about the baggies: we may not like how it looks, but we’re probably buying it anyway.
Similarly, these companies have a job to do. DC, and now Marvel, are not independent companies, but part of large entertainment conglomerates. As we pointed out before, if DC Comics doesn’t do this, somebody else in Time Warner is going to, and quite frankly, they’re not going to care what some English hippie thinks.
All that said, in the end, Moore does have a right to feel ill-used. He had an expectation, and DC honored the letter of their agreement, and not the spirit. At the same time, that doesn’t mean he’s a victim. We should save our concern for people who never get the opportunities Moore does, not the single most respected writer in the entire medium.

Being ancient, I just don’t get worked up into indignant nerd-rage these days. And yeah it’s hard to really feel sorry for Moore – I’d like to hear his answer to the question about diddling around with the characters of other authors. I suspect he’d probably give an honest answer and wouldn’t fail to see the situational irony. I also suspect he’s not going to lose sleep over all this. He doesn’t want or see the need for new stories in the Watchmen universe, but I don’t get the impression (from what I’ve read) that he’s figuratively yelling for everyone to get off his lawn. But I don’t know the man, so what the hell…
I personally don’t see the need for any more stories of Watchmen – look at all we have already. It’s not like we don’t know the back story. And who can write in Rorschach’s voice now without trying too hard to sound like the character and probably going over the top with it?
Maybe the new books will be genuinely good. If I hear enough good things about them, I might read them. My feeling is that they won’t add anything to the whole Watchmen universe, other than cash to DC’s wallet.
I think of the crew, Azzarello is the best choice. He’s rarely made a misstep with tone. Although that terrible “Joker” one-shot he did does have me a little concerned, not going to lie.
Yeah – I think his writing was the only one I could really stand in the whole “First Wave” debacle (although to be fair I’m guessing there was some heavy-handed editing going on).
Not sure he’ll be able to draw me into the Watchmen stuff. Guess I’ll wait and see what people have to say about it when they hit the racks.
Really, the only matter of concern here is a matter of creative burnout in the industry. When we’re revisiting a story that was good and finished almost 30 years ago, that’s a sign that we have no where to go. Same as the movie industry, same as television. We should be worried about THAT.
I’m less than concerned about a millionaire writer who killed all of his good will with me when he said that “hey, comics suck” a few years ago even though he’s been cashing the checks from the lunch money I forked over the counter from 1990 until today.
It sucks that they’re making new Watchmen and in principle I agree with Alan. But Mr. Moore, despite still being a genius, doesn’t get to complain about people fiddling with his stuff when he’s spent most of his career mining the public library for other people’s characters to play with. Tell me Mr. Moore, how would Lewis Carroll feel about Lost Girls?
Actually, considering that depending on who you ask he was either a pedophile or just way too into girls half his age, he’d probably own several copies.
Moore has a right to his opinion: I don’t think he’s ultimately opposed to anyone doing prequels, he just thinks it’s pointless. His concern is that he’s never gotten his characters back when he was supposed to.
Sadly we can’t ask Lewis Carroll. We don’t know because he’s dead.
Meanwhile, Alan Moore is alive and well and if you’d go so far as to ask Lewis Carroll, perhaps we should do the same for all writers living, dead, famous or obscure.
But in the end that’s Moore’s point. He’s never messed with the creations of living authors and artists. I think he’d rather wait until he was rotting in the grave before feeling DC’s mushroom breaching his cheeks.
GAWD, I’m tired of Alan Moore bitchin’ about “Watchman.” Granted, it was a great graphic novel about 30 years ago, but it wasn’t the second coming. The man was constructed a piece of work and was paid well for it. Do you see Frank Miller bitching about the multiple reprints of “The Dark Knight Returns,” or even Mark Millar bitching about “The Authority”?
Today, Moore spends as much time bitchin’ as he does writing – and from the amount of verbosity in his graphic novels, one gets the impression that he wants to be a novelist – with little or no appreciation for the illustrator’s contribution. He’s been biting the hand or at least ripping apart the genre that placed him on the map for years. We get it: You don’t like comics anymore. YOu don’t like the business, and you don’t like the people. Here’s an idea: write a book – no pictures – and move on.